The start of
EDEM630 was not as simple as the other courses that I had done through distance
learning. It was the layout of the course! It took me time to find my way
through! I thought what a change……after all it had to go with the course title:
Change with
Digital Technologies in Education. I experienced the change in the
first instance. After a few attempts, I was successful in accommodating the
change…and maybe still accommodating.
Then came the
first e-activity: Setting up the blog.
Being working
full time and also the last week of the school term, it was hard for me to
complete the activities. Being in a temporary accommodation with no internet, I
panicked but got a relief when received Wayne’s message that I can do it in the
weekend. Took very quick breaks at work to read what was happening in our
course..I felt I was missing a lot. At the end of the week, I drove home and from
next morning (while still on the breakfast table) started off with my work:
Setting up the blog, didn’t take me time as I had done it before but overlooked
the part of putting the label to each post and as a result my blog did not get
through in the blog feed. Upset!!!! Asked for help on the forum but did not get
any replies. My husband came to my rescue and later Timothy came in as well.
Thanks to both.J.
I worked all day on Saturday to complete all the tasks for the week. Next
morning I was delighted to see my blog feed on Learn.
Week 2 was
exciting as break from school has started and I thought I will have heaps of
time for EDEM630. To my surprise came the demands of my 5 year old boy. Every
time I sat on the computer, he came running with some requests…oops decided to
work on EDEM630 after he goes to bed at night and this was a successful plan
and is working till now.
During this
week: the ecological perspective of change was in discussion. It was amazing to
see that we worked around this change in education all the time and yet not
realized its role. After completing the e-activities for week 1 and 2 and
scanning the readings, I am able to make more out of Ecological arena of
change.
I feel that in a learning environment, learners work
together and support each other as they use a variety of tools and information
resources in their pursuit of learning goals and problem-solving activities
extends the meaning of the learning environment as the overall setting in which
learning communities come into being, evolve, die, regenerate and transform. According
to Visser (1999) in using an ecological metaphor, the learning
environment is linked to the biosphere and the learning environment is to learning
what the biosphere is to life.
Similarly, learning happens at a rich diversity of levels in
the learning environment and can be seen from different perspectives. At the
individual level, learning happens at the cognitive level. At the group level
when the individual learns with peers, interactions take place at the species
level as group, peer or social learning interactions. When different species or
populations coexist, there is a thriving community. Different communities form
a learning ecosystem in which there is interaction within and between each
level giving ecological arena. Examples of learning communities include the
school, the work place, the home, the extended environment of family and
friends, or a special interest group. The advent of the digital technology as a
medium for two–way interaction has brought about a variety of learning
communities in which people become members and derive great learning benefit
from their interaction. An ecological
perspective of change with digital technologies in
education
emphasises the relationships and dynamics between the
various participants in and outside the classroom or other learning situation.
Knowledge is distributed among different people and mediated
by tools and artifacts in the environment. Besides emphasizing the
relationships and dynamics between the various participants in a learning situation,
it is useful also to examine the interactions the participants have with the
changing tools, artifacts and content which are provided by designers or other
participants. Different
parts of the ecology co-evolve, changing together according to the relationships
in the system. As people participate in the ongoing development and change of
their ecological arena in education, they also drive the technological and
social aspects of this change . The participants of a learning ecology are
responsible for deciding how to use the tools and technologies available, and
in doing so, establish the identity and place of the technologies. Designers of tools for the Internet
are responsible for providing useful and clear functionality.
Ecological arena of change can be seen in terms of the
providers of education (ministry of education, school), the providers of the props
(commercial companies), and the consumers of the experiences (teachers and
students). The space (parents and community) is a vital part as well. The
change in this arena should be such that it soughts out ways to capitalise on
the lasting experience of education with technology by helping enrichment
opportunities for learners.
Over the last century there have been several waves of massive
investment in technology to improve education and the most recent movement to
put computers in schools. Despite the generous investment in, and increased
presence of, technology in schools, they have been found to be unused or
underused in most schools. So the
question that I want to ask is: What is the reason for this? And how can this
be corrected?
I know that the dispersal of technology uses in schools is a
very complex change. To understand this change it requires a comprehensive and
systemic approach that takes into consideration the nature of the technology, the
environment, other facilitative forces, and the interactions among these
components. And this is what I think I
have yet to learn. It is still a long way for me to go……
Visser, J. (1999) Overcoming the underdevelopment of
learning: A trans-disciplinary view, New
Horizons for Learning.
Retrieved from: http://www.newhorizons.org/ictr_visser1.htm
Hi Saleshini, I found your reflection very helpful especially about seeing and viewing learning from different perspectives. I think this is such a good course to get a view on the answers to that major question about underutilization of provided resources. Already we have seen from the models that the answers will be around the actual technology provided (Rogers) and the people who could potentially see it as useful and easy to use. I am with you about the people participating being the ones that drive the change no matter how theoretically good it might be. Thanks for helping me think :-)
ReplyDeleteLyndsay.